Will anyone in government have sense to reverse decision to ditch paper road tax discs?

The opposite day I instantly questioned whether or not my automobile was taxed. A number of years in the past, I might have merely checked by its windscreen

The opposite day I instantly questioned whether or not my automobile was taxed. A number of years in the past, I might have merely checked by its windscreen.

Now I needed to rummage round in an previous file for 5 minutes earlier than I might ensure I wasn't breaking the regulation.

Of all of the idiotic, pointless, counter-productive measures introduced in by governments lately, the abolition of the paper tax disc in October 2014 ought to certainly be put on the very high of a reasonably shameful listing.

The previous system, launched in 1921, labored flawlessly. You paid your cash at a put up workplace or put a cheque within the put up or, extra not too long ago, went on-line. You bought a beautiful colored disc which was displayed in your windscreen. You can see you had paid your street tax, and so might the authorities.

By no means did I as soon as hear anybody complain about this simple and environment friendly process which harked again virtually to the daybreak of motor automobiles. It commanded close to common respect as a result of it made such apparent sense.

And that, after all, is why the jobsworths on the Driver and Car Licensing Company (DVLA) determined to do away with it.

The primary purpose they gave for upsetting the apple-cart was that the brand new preparations would lower your expenses — £14 million a 12 months was the broadly quoted determine. In a time of austerity, one shouldn't scoff at modest money-saving measures. Each little bit helps.

So if the comparatively small sum of £14 million a 12 months actually had been saved, we'd put up with the inconvenience of the brand new system. Some would possibly even settle for the lure, into which many harmless individuals have fallen after they neglect to resume, of paying a high-quality or having a automobile disabled by opportunistic clampers.

However new figures obtained by The Instances newspaper following a Freedom of Info request affirm what many people strongly suspected. Removed from saving cash, this supposedly wizard new scheme is costing the DVLA a whole lot of tens of millions of kilos a 12 months in misplaced income.

It seems that within the 12 months earlier than the change was launched, the DVLA obtained slightly below £510 million a month. Within the 12 months after its stunningly good innovation, this determine fell to lower than £476 million a month.

By my calculations, that signifies that the DVLA collected slightly over £400 million lower than might need been anticipated within the 12 months after the previous, a lot cherished tax disc was junked.

For sure, the DVLA doesn't wholly settle for these figures. It claims a transfer to cost by direct debits makes strict comparisons unimaginable. This sounds to me like particular pleading by an organisation making an attempt to cowl up a grade one cock-up.

Even the DLVA, although, admits that street tax earnings fell by £93 million within the first 12 months of the brand new system. In different phrases, by its personal account, it misplaced six and a half occasions what it was purported to have saved.

The reason is sizeable variety of persons are deliberately failing to pay the brand new street tax. Within the previous days, a policeman or site visitors warden would possibly discover if a automobile wasn't displaying a licence, or if it had expired. Few needed to run that danger.

However now there are many rogues who do, and a few are getting away with it. The DVLA employs a personal firm known as NSL Companies which runs a fleet of vans with number-plate recognition cameras linked to the DVLA database. Optimistically, a van won't come your means.

In the meantime, some law-abiding residents are being snared as a result of they don't realise — now not possessing a paper disc — that their previous licence has expired. That's simple sufficient to do because the DVLA sends just one reminder, which can be smothered by mounds of similar-looking unsolicited mail.

Earlier than October 2014, 5,530 automobiles a month had been clamped or impounded for non-payment of street tax

Earlier than October 2014, 5,530 automobiles a month had been clamped or impounded for non-payment of street tax. By final summer season, the determine had risen to greater than 12,200 a month. There shall be many deliberate evaders amongst them, but additionally some innocents with poor recollections.

Such forgetful sorts can even be included within the a lot greater variety of individuals being fined for non-payment of street tax. (It rose by a 3rd within the six months after the change.) They can even be amongst these being persecuted by an ever rising legion of bailiffs employed by the DVLA.

What a daft mess! And but I don't hear any apologies emanating from both the Authorities or the DVLA for having dreamt up a scheme which is on the identical time depriving the Treasury of significant earnings and making life a distress for many people.

We must always hardly be stunned by the absence of contrition because the DVLA has a disgraceful report of placing its personal pursuits earlier than these whom it's meant to serve. It made tens of millions of kilos out of promoting our private knowledge to clampers till the rip-off was stopped.

In 2015, it excelled itself by scrapping the paper or counterpart driving licence. In case you now need to rent a automobile, the rental firm could need to know whether or not you've been responsible of any site visitors offences, which was once listed on the paper licence.

As a way to entry these particulars, the corporate will want a particular code from you, which you'll receive by telephoning the DVLA (count on an extended wait, for which you'll have to pay) or logging on. The code expires after 72 hours, so if you wish to lease one other automobile you'll must undergo the identical rigmarole yet again.

Whoever it's who thinks up these schemes in some cold workplace in Swansea, the place the DVLA is predicated, has no regard for our comfort, and assumes furthermore that everybody is pleased to go surfing immediately. Bodily proof — a paper disc or paper diving licence — is now not deemed fascinating or obligatory.

After all, civil servants divorced from the remainder of humanity usually make barmy calculations. For instance, the rise in stamp responsibility introduced by George Osborne, the then Chancellor, in December 2014 has value greater than it has raised — just like the abolition of the tax disc.

The Treasury obtained about half the anticipated additional £700 million. And, in keeping with the impartial think-tank Oxford Economics, the rise in stamp responsibility led to 1,950 fewer gross sales of properties value greater than £1 million, and not directly to the lack of 14,000 jobs. The fee to the financial system has been estimated at almost £1 billion.

As far as the paper street tax licence is worried, its abolition self-evidently helps nobody. I used to be astounded to learn that Edmund King, head of the AA, thinks 'we will't flip the clock again by re-introducing the tax disc'. And this from a person who doesn't like the brand new preparations!

Why on earth can't we flip the clock again? It will contain the panjandrums of the DVLA consuming humble pie, however the remainder of us would vastly get pleasure from that spectacle. They made an enormous mistake by ruining as good a system as might ever be devised by authorities.

Theresa Might has made a lot of her need to assist 'peculiar individuals'. The difficulty is that serving to them often includes spending extra money. However that wouldn't be the case with the re- introduction of the tax disc, which, in keeping with a latest ballot, is what three-quarters of drivers need.

It's a small factor in a means. However in one other means it's not. Bringing again one thing that used to work, and eliminating an ill-conceived and unpopular scheme that was unilaterally imposed upon us, would present that the Prime Minister actually does join with peculiar individuals.

Tweet