Hillary Clinton and the hypocritical Democrats aren't defending American democracy

Forged your minds again to a couple weeks earlier than the US election.

Republican nominee Donald Trump repeatedly said to anybody who would hear that the system was 'rigged' in opposition to him so he would lose and subsequently, he would possibly problem the outcome.

The response from Democrats, and far of the media, was on the spot and livid as they raced to denounce this 'unprecedented' assault on democracy.

Hillary Clinton's marketing campaign went even additional, branding Trump 'un-American'.

Bear in mind simply weeks earlier than the election when Hillary Clinton's marketing campaign branded Trump 'un-American' for saying he might problem the election the outcome?  On the time it by no means crossed their superior boastful minds that they may lose to him

After all, at that stage, the Clinton camp all assumed their candidate was going to win.

It by no means crossed their elitist, boastful, superior minds that Trump, a person they perceived to be an ignorant, unelectable Neanderthal, had a cat-in-hell's probability of beating the girl dubbed 'essentially the most certified candidate in historical past' by President Obama.

Then Trump sensationally triumphed, sparking weeks of Biblical scale weeping and wailing from those that opposed him.

Their deluded, defiant, sore loser fury has recognized no bounds.

Certainly, it has now escalated in its depth and desperation.

'However Hillary gained the favored vote!' they first shrieked, meaninglessly. As everybody with half a mind is aware of, the US common election is just not and by no means has been determined by widespread vote. If it have been, then campaigning could be performed in a really completely different method.

'The election outcomes have been fastened!' they then bellowed, as Inexperienced loser Jill Stein launched a pathetic evidence-devoid bid, backed by Clinton's marketing campaign, to demand recounts in three states. Her lamentable motion was thrown out by judges in Pennsylvania and Michigan. And in Wisconsin, the one state the place there's been a full recount, Trump's lead really elevated!

Now, the Clinton camp's launched one last, breathtakingly silly and extremely harmful Hail Mary move.

In an astonishing growth, Hillary's marketing campaign chairman John Podesta has publicly endorsed an tried coup by members of the Electoral Faculty to attempt to overturn the election outcome subsequent week.

There's now a mass Democrat-led effort to thwart Trump's presidency from ever beginning - however the blame ought to lie with Obama and people in his authorities whose job it's to cease hacks. All of the squealing would carry extra weight if it hadn't been for their very own failures

Ten members of the Faculty have made a proper request to the Director of Nationwide Intelligence, James Clapper, to provide extra data on the connection between Trump and Russia earlier than they finalise their votes on December 19.

They mentioned they're doing so to 'examine, talk about and deliberate with our colleagues about whom to vote for within the election' and to assist them determine if Trump is 'match to function President of the US.'

Podesta, on behalf of Clinton, has supported their transfer, claiming that Russia intervened within the election to Trump's profit by hacking into Democrat emails, together with his personal, and leaking them to Wikileaks who then posted them.

The CIA shares this view.

As does the White Home, which even steered yesterday that Trump was in on the rip-off as a result of he jokily inspired the Russians to search out the 30,000 emails that Hillary deleted from her notorious non-public server.

It's thus a mass Democrat-led effort to thwart Trump's presidency from even beginning.

There's only one downside, and it's the very same downside that made a mockery of Jill Stein's criticism: there isn't any precise proof to help any of this.

No person has confirmed the Russians hacked anybody on this election, and no person has confirmed Trump knew about any such hacking even when it ever occurred.

They're all simply guessing.

Or within the case of the CIA, it's their 'perception' that Russia and Wikileaks have been in cahoots. Through which case, I recommend they in a short time present us why they consider this, not least as a result of the FBI doesn't apparently share its rival company's opinion.

However what if it IS true?

Say the Russians did goal Democrats' emails, and gave them to Julian Assange's vociferously anti-Clinton staff to intentionally affect the election.

a) It might hardly be a terrific shock and b) whose fault would that be?

I'd say the fault of the CIA, FBI and each different US intelligence company charged with stopping such hacking from occurring.

All of them knew in regards to the large menace of an internet assault throughout this election.

Solely final 12 months, Sony was hacked by North Korea to devastating impact.

And it's been broadly accepted for years that the Chinese language hack something that strikes in American our on-line world.

Ought to they've wished to look just a little nearer to dwelling for recommendation, they may have requested Edward Snowden simply how straightforward it's for the NSA to hack into individuals's private data.

So it could be a stupendously dumb and deeply embarrassing breach of supposed intelligence if the Russians HAD been in a position to do what all of them now need us to consider they did.

And the blame would absolutely lie not with Trump however Obama and people in his authorities whose job it's to cease these hacks taking place.

US intelligence companies are charged with stopping hackings. They may have requested Edward Snowden simply how straightforward it's for the NSA to hack private data. And keep in mind, Obama got here to Britain and warned in opposition to Brexit - his personal shameless try and 'rig' a vote

All of the Democrat squealing now would frankly carry much more weight if it hadn't been their very own failures which will or might not have led to any hacking within the first place.

There's additionally a wider hypocrisy right here and that's in regards to the subject of international entities making an attempt to intrude in free, democratic elections held in different international locations.

Earlier this summer time, I appear to recollect Barack Obama coming over to my nation, Britain, and warning us that if we didn't all vote to remain within the European Union then we'd be 'again of the queue' when it got here to future commerce offers.

That was nearly essentially the most deliberate, shameless try and 'rig' an election (or on this case, referendum) I've ever seen. Right here was essentially the most highly effective man on earth mainly placing the arm on a a lot smaller nation to get the outcome he wished.

The truth that Obama failed in his mission is immaterial.

What we're witnessing now with the Electoral Faculty is an equally sinister try and tamper with the need of the individuals.

It's additionally simply as disgustingly hypocritical.

Hillary Clinton misplaced honest and sq. on November eight and there's zero concrete proof to recommend in any other case.

Somewhat than take her defeat with good grace, she has tried every little thing to get the outcome modified.

Now she is concentrating on the very cornerstone of American democracy, utilizing spurious allegations about unproven Russian hacking to influence members of the Electoral Faculty to alter the votes they're presupposed to robotically solid to replicate the votes of their particular person state citizens.

Because the Democrats berated Trump when he mentioned he may not settle for the outcome: this isn't simply an unprecedented and harmful assault on democracy, it's profoundly un-American. 

 

Tweet